Why Theistic Evolution is Redundant

Dr. Stacy Trasancos

Dr. Stacy Trasancos

This week Stacy Trasancos, one of my favorite bloggers on the intersection of faith and science, had a good comment on the term “theistic evolution”.  Dr. Trasancos says the term is redundant and unhelpful:

The term “theistic evolution” is used in contrast to the atheistic idea of evolution. It means evolution set in motion by God or under the direction of God, and seems appropriate for a believer who admits [the] truth to evolutionary science. But I don’t like the phrase because it’s a confusing redundancy. Think about it. If you’re a believer, it’s already implied that you see all biological and physical processes as created and held in existence by God. You don’t need “theistic” in front of biological terms. Who speaks of theistic reproduction? Or theistic gestation, theistic meiosis, or theistic menstruation? Plus, to qualify a biological process as “theistic” implies that the opposite is possible, that God may not be involved in creating certain laws of nature.

* * *

Richard Dawkins called the term “theistic evolution” an attempt to “smuggle God in by the back door,” and he was right. God doesn’t need us to do that. Be confident that God, who became Incarnate, makes Himself known through His creation. When we gather to assess and critique evolutionary science, the believers will praise God for his handiwork and the atheists will do whatever they do. To grasp this confidence and clarity is to grasp why science doesn’t draw a rational person away from religion. In fact, science, like a good meal shared among friends, can even draw a searching mind closer to his Maker.

Read full post here

About William Ockham

I am a father of two with eclectic interests in theology, philosophy and sports. I chose the pseudonym William Ockham in honor of his contributions to philosophy, specifically Occam's Razor, and its contributions to modern scientific theory. My blog (www.teilhard.com) explores Ignatian Spirituality and the intersection of faith, science and reason through the life and writings of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (pictured above).
This entry was posted in Reason and Faith and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why Theistic Evolution is Redundant

  1. Lynda says:

    It is so true that we don’t have to sneak God into any discussion. God is evident to those who “have ears to hear” and our rational arguments will not influence the thinking of anyone who is determined not to hear. That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t cooperate with God to help others to see the truth of God’s existence but it does mean that we do this in the proper venue and by the way in which we live our lives. Jesus preached but Jesus also met the people where they were and as Jesus touched a person, that person met the reality who is God. Thanks for sharing this post with us.

  2. I agree with Dr. Stacy Trasancos that adding the word ‘theistic’ is redundant. While it may be intended to serve as a truth of God’s existence in our universe, it makes no difference to non-believers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s