I was hoping to save this post and series until later, when I could have had a more comprehensive assessment. However, as I am becoming more immersed into the blogosphere, I am starting to realize how controversial a figure Teilhard de Chardin is in some circles. I knew that Teilhard was a lightening rod among some schismatic heretics such as SSPX. I also knew that certain non-Christian spiritual authors had taken a stale, watered-down, non-Christian version of Teilhard de Chardin in their spiritualities. However, I was absolutely shocked that even mainstream Catholics of good faith are still skeptical of the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin. This post is the first of a series which will hopefully put these notions to rest.
The misconception of non-orthodoxy on Teilhard de Chardin comes from two sources. First, Teilhard was prohibited from publishing his theological writings during his lifetime. Teilhard was allowed to publish scientific papers arising out of his work as a paleontologist. Second, many of Teilhard’s writings were published after his death. The pre-Vatican II Church issued a warning on Teilhard’s writings (but notably did not put any of Teilhard’s works on the Prohibited Index, which existed until 1966). The primary concern about Teilhard’s orthodoxy was over his explanation of original sin. I will not get into the debate on whether the warning was issued under misformed pretenses or dissect its meaning but you can read the full warning here.
What I will focus on in this series is how Teilhard de Chardin’s vision was incorporated into Catholic theology by leading theologian of the last 50 years. There are many outstanding contemporary theologians (e.g. John Haught and Ilia Delio) who have taken Teilhard’s core ideas and expanded them in a more coherent theology. However, some Catholic critics of Teilhard de Chardin are unlikely to be convinced by non-hierarchical current theologians, much less a lay person in rural Wisconsin:-).
Hence, in this initial series on the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin, we will focus on three outstanding theologians who also speak for the Church: Pope Emeritus Benedict, Cardinal Henri de Lubac and Archbishop Józef Życiński.
During the first week of this series, we will focus on one of the most influential theologians during my spiritual journey, Pope Emeritus Benedict. Benedict was known for many things. But perhaps he was best known for embracing the liturgy as the focal point of Christian worship. In 2000, Pope Emeritus Benedict (then Joseph Ratzinger) published “The Spirit of the Liturgy“, which was described as follows: “In this beautiful treatment of the “great prayer of the Church,” Pope Benedict XVI offers his insights on many areas of the Liturgy to help readers rediscover the spiritual wealth and grandeur of the Liturgy as the very center of our Christian life.”
In Chapter 2 of this book, Benedict describes how Teilhard’s theological vision of Christ is central to the Christian liturgical and Eucharistic experience:
“And so we can now say that the goal of worship and the goal of creation as a whole are one and the same—divinization, a world of freedom and love. But this means that the historical makes its appearance in the cosmic. The cosmos is not a kind of closed building, a stationary container in which history may by chance take place. It is itself movement, from its one beginning to its one end. In a sense, creation is history. Against the background of the modern evolutionary world view, Teilhard de Chardin depicted the cosmos as a process of ascent, a series of unions. From very simple beginnings the path leads to ever greater and more complex unities, in which multiplicity is not abolished but merged into a growing synthesis, leading to the “Noosphere”, in which spirit and its understanding embrace the whole and are blended into a kind of living organism. Invoking the epistles to the Ephesians and Colossians, Teilhard looks on Christ as the energy that strives toward the Noosphere and finally incorporates everything in its “fullness’. From here Teilhard went on to give a new meaning to Christian worship: the transubstantiated Host is the anticipation of the transformation and divinization of matter in the christological “fullness”. In his view, the Eucharist provides the movement of the cosmos with its direction; it anticipates its goal and at the same time urges it on.” (emphasis added)
— Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal; Pope Benedict XVI (2009-06-11). The Spirit of the Liturgy (Kindle Locations 260-270). Ignatius Press. Kindle Edition.
Tomorrow, we will continue our discussion of how Pope Benedict Emeritus incorporates the vision of Teilhard de Chardin’s cosmic host into Christian theology and concern for the environment.
Orthodoxy of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Series:
Part I: Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses Teilhard de Chardin’s theological vision of Christ as a central feature of the Christian liturgical and Eucharistic experience
Part II: Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses statements made by St. Paul and Teilhard de Chardin of the cosmos being a living host.
Part III: The concept of the role of the Cosmic Christ (the pre-existent logos who is the second person of the Trinity) in the creation of the cosmos.
Part IV: Teilhard de Chardin’s comments on the ontological evolution of humanity from mere matter to spiritual consciousness as summarized by Pope Emeritus Benedict.
Part V: Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses Teilhard de Chardin’s views on the evolution of humanity in the Christian context towards the Omega Point, or the Cosmic Christ.
Part VI: Cardinal Henri de Lubac discusses the incarnational theology of Teilhard de Chardin that has Christ as its center.
Pingback: Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin (Part II): Benedict and the Cosmos as a Living Host | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Christians Must Confront Scientific Illiteracy | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin: (Part III) (Pope Benedict) | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin: (Part IV) (Christ as the Evolution of Humanity) | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin: (Part V) (Resurrection, Evolution and the Omega Point) | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Orthdoxy of Teilhard de Chardin (Part VI) (Henri De Lubac) | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Life of Teilhard de Chardin: Writing and Research in France (1918-1923) | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: Dan Burke and Accuracy on Teilhard de Chardin | Teilhard de Chardin
Pingback: 2013 Reflections on Blogging (Part I): Country Data and Top Posts | Teilhard de Chardin
Of course misses out the fact that Benedict then goes on to say that de Chardin went too far…. But whatever…
Thank you for your comments. I have certainly not read everything that Pope Benedict has written but I have a read a lot. The only slightly negative comment I have read on Teilhard de Chardin by Pope Benedict was that Teilhard had “a not entirely unobjectionable tendency toward the biological approach”. (“Introduction to Christianity”). Aside from that fairly harmless commentary, everything I have read by Pope Benedict on Teilhard de Chardin has been exceptionally positive.
“I was absolutely shocked that even mainstream Catholics of good faith are still skeptical of the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin.”
Yes indeed; in fact, it would not surprise me that de Chardin may in review be said to be a theological light-weight or a philosophical light-weight or a scientific light-weight by various crowds.
I know by my own experience and by a great many hours of research that we may change, even perhaps genetically, in a single lifetime, according to our experiences. Humans also have tendency to regress. Thus, the changes that may occur even out as it seems so that there is a gradual change in humanity.
Teilhard is criticized for his statements about the evolving of a consciousness. It’s as though somehow, many theologians may believe that we shall stand as we do in form; wholly separate individuals in eternity. How strange would be that? We’d not evolve in spirit to all that is to be known? Not as all of us as one consciousness with all God’s promise to create with Him whatever He may capably love with us to create?
I’m not so great at contrasting and defending and making points in a debate that is all in my head as though it is with someone and that I don’t bother.
I think it wise to consider what Teilhard predicts. So far, it hasn’t done me wrong.
Pingback: Peanut Butter & Grace : Catholic family life, sweet & simple
Pingback: You Are a Sinner? Congratulations!😉 – Perhaps of Interest
In your brief bio you mention you note that you are a sports fan and reside in Wisconsin. Are you a Milwaukee Bucks fan?
Yes, I am a big Bucks fan. I am hoping they can finish strong and have another title run this year!