Teilhard de Chardin Quote of the Week (May 27): Joy and the Presence of God

joy

“Joy is the infallible sign of the presence of God.”

— Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

One of the many things I admire about Teilhard de Chardin is that, despite all his numerous struggles (e.g. horrific carnage of WWI, early death of multiple siblings, exile to China and censorship by religious authorities), he seemed to have a magnetic joy and optimism.

I would like to supplement the quote by Teilhard de Chardin with a blogpost from a Christian perspective by Deacon David Backes.  I encourage you to read the full post, but here is an excerpt:

“[J]oy is a key indicator of a healthy spirituality.  Joy, in its classic sense, is not a synonym for happiness, but instead refers to zest for life.  You can have an underlying zest for life whether you are happy or whether you are sad.

* * *

True joy never involves avoiding reality.  It means facing it head on–not just the bad, not just the good, but all of it, without fear.  In fact, from a Christian perspective, because joy is based in a deep appreciation of the goodness and wonder of God and God’s creation, it is naturally accompanied by hope, no matter how bleak things may look to others.

A joyful person weeps at tragedy, but does not dwell long in grief, and does not despair.  A joyful person smiles when things are going well, but does not forget to be grateful.  And a joyful person laughs–laughs at jokes, laughs with delight, and perhaps most of all laughs when recognizing his or her own foibles and delusions of grandeur.

A joyful person has found the zest for life that our consumer culture promises but never delivers.”

Posted in Teilhard Quote of the Week | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Sunday Reflection: Solemnity of the Holy Trinity (Communion With Others)

Mystery of the Trinity

Mystery of the Trinity

This week’s reflection on the Solemnity of the Holy Trinity comes from a 2012 sermon from Rev. William A. Doubleday of St. Mark’s Episcopal Church, Mt. Kisco, NY:

“How easy it is to come down hard on our fellow human beings in the name of God the Wrathful Judge of some particular Biblical passage, forgetting completely that “God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.” How tempting it sometimes is for us to demean or reject Jews, or Hindus, or Muslims, or Buddhists, or Baha’is, or the adherents of other religions, ignoring the reality that God the Creator, who was and is the God of Abraham and Sarah, as well as the God of Moses and the Prophets, has been revealing God’s self in the world in countless ways throughout all of human history. How easy it can be to be taken up by the excitement of spiritual or religious experience in the present day, and in the process fail to hold up one’s own experience of the Holy Spirit to the light of the Gospel or to the extensive revelation of God in Holy Scripture or in the History of God’s Church.   Again and again, the Doctrine of the Trinity has represented and has provided a healthy caution against and corrective to the experiences of excess, incompleteness, and intolerance within the theology and the communal life of the Church.

The Doctrine of the Trinity is one of the ways the Church has systematically reminded itself of the totality of God, a totality which we as individuals, in a particular time and place, can never fully grasp, comprehend, or even imagine – a totality which is indeed still coming into being as it will for all time. The Book of Revelation speaks of the Alpha and the Omega – the Beginning and the End. The great Roman Catholic theologian Teilhard de Chardin wrote in the 1950’s of a vision of an evolving – processive -universe – in which, having been created by God, we are individually and corporately in movement towards completion – towards perfection – towards the omega point of creation. God’s purposes for us, as well as our own lives, are as yet unfolding.

* * *

If our idea of God is judgmental, we will be judgmental. If our idea of God is exclusive, our lives and churches will likely be exclusive as well. If our idea of God is distorted or self-serving that probably tells us something about ourselves as well. If our idea of God is Trinitarian –  rooted in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit– our lives and faith are likely to be more Eucharistic, more servant-like, more communal, more cooperative, more balanced, more whole, more relational, and hopefully, at least a little more comprehensive, and hopefully a little more complete..

Truly God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit; the One who Creates, Redeems, and Sustains Us; is the Very One Who Created Us, Loves Us, Calls Us Into Loving Relationship with God and with One Another – both on this Trinity Sunday and all the days of our lives.” 

Posted in Sunday Reflections | Tagged | Leave a comment

Scientific Potpourri

time

Here are some interesting scientific stories on cosmology and evolution from the last week.  Major kudos goes to MetaNexus, which is a great resources for identifying several of these articles:

Evolution’s Two-Way Street.  Scientific American discusses that evolution may be a two-way street: not only have humans adapted to the environment, but the environment has also adapted to human evolution (and not just in the last 1,000 years).

How Will Human’s Evolve in the Future?  IO9 speculates on the history of human evolution.  I am still partial to Julian May’s vision, based on Teilhard de Chardin on the future of human evolution.

Resetting the Theory of Time.  NPR Science Friday had a great interview with Lee Smolin, theoretical physicist, on the meaning of time.  I still can’t get my mind around what happens “before” time was created (it is a contradictory statement).

Dog and Human Genome Evolved Together?.  From National Geographic, a new study from the University of Chicago argues that dogs were domesticated 32,000 years ago (older than most current estimates) and that they evolved together.  As someone with musophobia, I thought the explanation for the symbiosis between humans and dogs and cats was as simple as humans needing someone to take care of the rodents in the caves.

The “Missing Link” Galaxy?  Science Daily has an article on the finding of two giant galaxies colliding before exhausting all of the hydrogen in the galaxies.  This find is described as “the equivalent of discovering a missing link between winged dinosaurs and early birds.”

Happy Memorial Day weekend to everyone in the United States!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin: (Part IV) (Christ as the Evolution of Humanity)

touching_the_divine

In Part I of our series on the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin, we described how Pope Emeritus Benedict held Teilhard’s theological vision of Christ as a central feature of the Christian liturgical and Eucharistic experience

In Part II of our series, we discussed Pope Emeritus Benedict’s approval of statements made by St. Paul and Teilhard of the cosmos being a living host.

In Part III, we started to discuss the concept of the role of the Cosmic Christ (the pre-existent logos who is the second person of the Trinity) in the creation of the cosmos.

Today, we will continue Pope Emeritus Benedict’s discussion of Teilhard’s ideas in the describing the relationship of Christ to humanity.  In the subchapter titled “Christ, ‘The Last Man'”, of Pope Emeritus Benedict’s masterpiece, Introduction to Christianity, Benedict discusses the “hominization” (a term Teilhard frequently used) of humanity, that is “the step from animal to logos, from mere life to mind.”  Benedict stated that humanity is most fully human, indeed the true human, when they “not only have contact with the infinite-the Infinite Being!-but is one with him: Jesus Christ. In him ‘hominization’ has truly reached its goal.”  Pope Emeritus Benedict went on to explain this relationship between humanity and Christ in the vision of Teilhard de Chardin:

“It must be regarded as an important service of Teilhard de Chardin’s that he rethought these ideas from the angle of the modern view of the world and, in spite of a not entirely unobjectionable tendency toward the biological approach, nevertheless on the whole grasped them correctly and in any case made them accessible once again. Let us listen to his own words: The human monad “can only be absolutely itself by ceasing to be alone”. In the background is the idea that in the cosmos, alongside the two orders or classes of the infinitely small and the infinitely big, there is a third order, which determines the real drift of evolution, namely, the order of the infinitely complex. It is the real goal of the ascending process of growth or becoming; it reaches a first peak in the genesis of living things and then continues to advance to those highly complex creations that give the cosmos a new center: “Imperceptible and accidental as the position they hold may be in the history of the heavenly bodies, in the last analysis the planets are nothing less than the vital points of the universe. It is through them that the axis now runs, on them is henceforth concentrated the main effort of an evolution aiming principally at the production of large molecules.” The examination of the world by the dynamic criterion of complexity thus signifies “a complete inversion of values. A reversal of the perspective.”

But let us return to man. He is so far the maximum in complexity. But even he as mere man-monad cannot represent an end; his growth itself demands a further advance in complexity: “At the same time as he represents an individual centered on himself (that is, a ‘person’), does not Man also represent an element in relation to some new and higher synthesis?” That is to say, man is indeed, on the one hand, already an end that can no longer be reversed, no longer be melted down again; yet in the juxtaposition of individual men he is not yet at the goal but shows himself to be an element, as it were, that longs for a whole that will embrace it without destroying it. Let us look at a further text, in order to see in what direction such ideas lead: “Contrary to the appearances still accepted by Physics, the Great Stability is not below—in the infra-elemental—but above—in the ultra-synthetic.” So it must be discovered that, “If things hold and hold together, it is only by virtue of ‘complexification’, from the top.” I think we are confronted here with a crucial statement; at this point the dynamic view of the world destroys the positivistic conception, which seems so obvious to us, that stability is located only in the “mass”, in hard material. That the world is in the last resort put together and held together “from above” here becomes evident in a way that is particularly striking because we are so little accustomed to it.

This leads to a further passage in Teilhard de Chardin that is worth quoting in order to give at least some indication here, by means of a few fragmentary excerpts, of his general outlook. “The Universal Energy must be a Thinking Energy if it is not to be less highly evolved than the ends animated by its action. And consequently . . . the attributes of cosmic value with which it is surrounded in our modern eyes do not affect in the slightest the necessity obliging us to recognize in it a transcendent form of Personality.” (emphasis added)

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal; Pope Benedict XVI; Benedict; J. R. Foster; Michael J. Miller (2010-06-04). Introduction To Christianity, 2nd Edition (Kindle Locations 2840-2865). Ignatius Press. Kindle Edition.

Next week, we will continue Pope Benedict’s discussion of Teilhard’s vision that the Incarnation of Christ constituted an “evolutionary leap” in the ascent of humanity.

Posted in Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin: (Part III) (Pope Benedict)

Pope Benedict and Teilhard de Chardin want us to think big.

Pope Benedict and Teilhard de Chardin want us to think big.

In Part I of our series on the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin, we described how Pope Emeritus Benedict held Teilhard’s theological vision of Christ as a central feature of the Christian liturgical and Eucharistic experience

In Part II of our series, we discussed Pope Emeritus Benedict’s approval of statements made by St. Paul and Teilhard of the cosmos being a living host.

Today, we will begin to elaborate on the concept of the role of Christ in the creation of the cosmos.  Most of Christianity focus on the Christ as the incarnation of Jesus of Nazareth.  That is certain true and appropriate but there is also a cosmic dimension that is often overlooked.  Christ, as the second person of the Trinity, had a transcendent existence before Jesus of Nazareth and even before the Big Bang (to the extent that the concept of “before” has any meaning since time was not a construct until after the Big Bang).

In the words of Pope Emeritus Benedict:

“The Roman creed (and with it the Western creed in general) is more concerned with the history of salvation and with Christology. It lingers, so to speak, on the positivistic side of the Christian story; it simply accepts the fact that to save us God became man; it does not seek to penetrate beyond this story to its causes and to its connection with the totality of being. The East (Orthodox Christians), on the other hand, has always sought to see the Christian faith in a cosmic and metaphysical perspective, which is mirrored in professions of faith above all by the fact that Christology and belief in creation are related to each other, and thus the uniqueness of the Christian story and the everlasting, all-embracing nature of the creation come into close association. We shall return later to discuss how today this enlarged perspective is at last beginning to gain currency in the Western consciousness as well, especially as a result of stimuli from the work of Teilhard de Chardin.” (emphasis added).

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal; Pope Benedict XVI; Benedict; J. R. Foster; Michael J. Miller (2010-06-04). Introduction To Christianity, 2nd Edition (Kindle Locations 953-959). Ignatius Press. Kindle Edition.

Tomorrow, we will discuss Pope Emeritus Benedict’ further elaboration on how Christ, represents the fulfillment of the hominization of humanity.

Posted in Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Christians Must Confront Scientific Illiteracy

God loves good science

God loves good science

“Interpretation of biblical passages must be informed by the current state of demonstrable knowledge. . . Many non-Christians are well versed in natural knowledge, so they can detect vast ignorance in such a Christian and laugh it to scorn.” — Attributed to St. Augustine.

Last week, I had a blogpost on how some scientists take scientific principles and inaccurately attempt to extend them to philosophical realm without recognizing or acknowledging that these are two different spheres of knowledge.  This generated a fair amount of good discussion in the Comments and via e-mail.

This week, I would like to talk about an equally insidious problem that religious people face in Western culture: an appalling lack of knowledge by many religious people on scientific matters.  I am fortunate to come from a faith tradition that has long supported science and viewed it as

In a fantastic article at Huffington Post, Charles J. Reid, Jr., Professor of Law at St. Thomas University,

“Where science is concerned, responsible Christians are caught in the vice grip of two extremes. On the one hand, there is the defiant and willful ignorance of persons like Congressman Paul Broun (R-Ga.), who famously declared during last fall’s election cycle that “evolution and the big bang theory are lies straight from the pit of hell.” And on the other hand, there is the cool atheism of someone like Richard Dawkins, contentedly dismissing the whole of religious experience as the magical thinking of the great superstitious mass of humankind.

Christians must provide effective witness against both extremes. But before Christianity can engage atheism it must first address the scientific illiteracy in its own house. For the greatest danger Christianity confronts at the present moment is not incipient persecution, but increasing marginalization and irrelevance. If Christians cannot engage reasonably and responsibly with science, there will be no place for them in the public life of advanced societies.”

Professor Reid goes on to further highlight the fantastic scientific discoveries that Christian clerics have made over the centuries, including

  • Nicolaus Copernicus (Catholic monk), who was the first to mathematically articulate a heliocentric theory of the solar system;
  • Gregor Mendel (Augustian monk), who is the father of modern genetics; and
  • Georges Lemaître (Belgian priest), who first devised the Big Bang theory of the creation of the universe.

Modern Christians who have made significant contributions to science include Francis Collins, leader of the team that mapped the human genome, and John Polkinghorne (Anglican priest), member of a team that discovered the quark.

My personal recent favorite is Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, paleontologist and geologist from the early 20th century.  Teilhard de Chardin was Catholic Jesuit priest who studied human evolution.  Teilhard de Chardin was a leader of the team that discovered the Peking Man, now known as Homo Erectus, in 1929.  Teilhard worked hard to integrate his scientific findings into a broad vision of Christianity.  Although Teilhard had some disagreements with the Church during his lifetime on the theological implications of evolution, the Church fully supported and encouraged Teilhard’s scientific research and publications.  Today, Teilhard’s core ideas on the marriage of evolution (both cosmic and biological) and theological evolution (all of natural and spiritual creation is evolving towards a deeper union with God) is accepted as part of mainstream Christian theology.

So it is very frustrating when a vocal minority of Christians deny basic scientific facts or inquiry.  Not only does this cast all Christians in a negative light, it also diminishes the wonder of a loving God who has created the vast cosmos with exquisite scientific and artistic detail and precision.  

The Christian Gospel message is a compelling story.  The message of unity, love and peace resonates with the deepest longings of humanity for a sense of purpose and meaning in life.  The Christian Gospel message is supported by all forms of human knowledge, from sciences, arts, music, philosophy, history, divine revelation and human experience.  In a Western society that so values scientific knowledge, Christians should embrace good science as Christianity has done over the 2,000 years, recognizing that good science ultimately points to the Truth of God’s revelation.

[Update:  In honor of St. Dominic, the patron saint of scientists, I did a blogpost on famous scientists who were also strong Christians.]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin (Part II): Benedict and the Cosmos as a Living Host

POPE_in_alps

“By now, no one would dream of saying that [Teilhard] is a heterodox author who shouldn’t be studied” — Fr. Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman (July 2009).

_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________

As shown yesterday, the thoughts of Teilhard de Chardin are an important component of  Pope Emeritus Benedict’s view of the Eucharist and the Liturgy.  In future posts, we will discuss that Teilhard’s theology has been part of Pope Emeritus Benedict’s broader view of Christianity theology.  Today, we will focus on Pope Emeritus Benedict’s application of Teilhard’s theology during his pontificate, primarily as part of Benedict’s extraordinary record on the environment.

In 2009, during a Vespers service, Pope Emeritus Benedict was commenting on the relationship between God, creation and humanity, citing Teilhard de Chardin.  John Allen of National Catholic Reporter summarizes the speech:

“Toward the end of a reflection upon the Letter to the Romans, in which St. Paul writes that the world itself will one day become a form of living worship, the pope said, “It’s the great vision that Teilhard de Chardin also had: At the end we will have a true cosmic liturgy, where the cosmos becomes a living host.

“Let’s pray to the Lord that he help us be priests in this sense,” the pope said, “to help in the transformation of the world in adoration of God, beginning with ourselves.””

I disagree with John Allen’s characterization of the controversy over Teilhard.  I believe there is no major controversy in theological circles, only in the communication of this theology to the broader Christian audience.  Pope Emeritus Benedict’s comments show the integration of Catholic theology between God, humanity and the obligation to care for creation.

Posted in Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin (Part I): Pope Benedict and Spirit of the Liturgy

Pope Emeritus Benedict Endorses Teilhard de Chardin

Pope Emeritus Benedict Endorses Teilhard de Chardin

Teilhard_Christ

__________

I was hoping to save this post and series until later, when I could have had a more comprehensive assessment.  However, as I am becoming more immersed into the blogosphere, I am starting to realize how controversial a figure Teilhard de Chardin is in some circles.  I knew that Teilhard was a lightening rod among some schismatic heretics such as SSPX.  I also knew that certain non-Christian spiritual authors had taken a stale, watered-down, non-Christian version of Teilhard de Chardin in their spiritualities.  However, I was absolutely shocked that even mainstream Catholics of good faith are still skeptical of the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin.  This post is the first of a series which will hopefully put these notions to rest.

The misconception of non-orthodoxy on Teilhard de Chardin comes from two sources.  First, Teilhard was prohibited from publishing his theological writings during his lifetime.  Teilhard was allowed to publish scientific papers arising out of his work as a paleontologist.   Second, many of Teilhard’s writings were published after his death.  The pre-Vatican II Church issued a warning on Teilhard’s writings (but notably did not put any of Teilhard’s works on the Prohibited Index, which existed until 1966).  The primary concern about Teilhard’s orthodoxy was over his explanation of original sin.  I will not get into the debate on whether the warning was issued under misformed pretenses or dissect its meaning but you can read the full warning here.

What I will focus on in this series is how Teilhard de Chardin’s vision was incorporated into Catholic theology by leading theologian of the last 50 years.  There are many outstanding contemporary theologians (e.g. John Haught and Ilia Delio) who have taken Teilhard’s core ideas and expanded them in a more coherent theology.  However, some Catholic critics of Teilhard de Chardin are unlikely to be convinced by non-hierarchical current theologians, much less a lay person in rural Wisconsin:-).

Hence, in this initial series on the orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin, we will focus on three outstanding theologians who also speak for the Church:  Pope Emeritus Benedict, Cardinal Henri de Lubac and Archbishop Józef Życiński.    

During the first week of this series, we will focus on one of the most influential theologians during my spiritual journey, Pope Emeritus Benedict.  Benedict was known for many things.  But perhaps he was best known for embracing the liturgy as the focal point of Christian worship.  In 2000, Pope Emeritus Benedict (then Joseph Ratzinger) published “The Spirit of the Liturgy“, which was described as follows:  “In this beautiful treatment of the “great prayer of the Church,” Pope Benedict XVI offers his insights on many areas of the Liturgy to help readers rediscover the spiritual wealth and grandeur of the Liturgy as the very center of our Christian life.”

In Chapter 2 of this book, Benedict describes how Teilhard’s theological vision of Christ is central to the Christian liturgical and Eucharistic experience:

“And so we can now say that the goal of worship and the goal of creation as a whole are one and the same—divinization, a world of freedom and love. But this means that the historical makes its appearance in the cosmic. The cosmos is not a kind of closed building, a stationary container in which history may by chance take place. It is itself movement, from its one beginning to its one end. In a sense, creation is history. Against the background of the modern evolutionary world view, Teilhard de Chardin depicted the cosmos as a process of ascent, a series of unions. From very simple beginnings the path leads to ever greater and more complex unities, in which multiplicity is not abolished but merged into a growing synthesis, leading to the “Noosphere”, in which spirit and its understanding embrace the whole and are blended into a kind of living organism. Invoking the epistles to the Ephesians and Colossians, Teilhard looks on Christ as the energy that strives toward the Noosphere and finally incorporates everything in its “fullness’. From here Teilhard went on to give a new meaning to Christian worship: the transubstantiated Host is the anticipation of the transformation and divinization of matter in the christological “fullness”. In his view, the Eucharist provides the movement of the cosmos with its direction; it anticipates its goal and at the same time urges it on.” (emphasis added)

— Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal; Pope Benedict XVI (2009-06-11). The Spirit of the Liturgy (Kindle Locations 260-270). Ignatius Press. Kindle Edition.

Tomorrow, we will continue our discussion of how Pope Benedict Emeritus incorporates the vision of Teilhard de Chardin’s cosmic host into Christian theology and concern for the environment.

Orthodoxy of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Series:

Part I:  Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses Teilhard de Chardin’s theological vision of Christ as a central feature of the Christian liturgical and Eucharistic experience

Part II: Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses statements made by St. Paul and Teilhard de Chardin of the cosmos being a living host.

Part III:   The concept of the role of the Cosmic Christ (the pre-existent logos who is the second person of the Trinity) in the creation of the cosmos.

Part IV:  Teilhard de Chardin’s comments on the ontological evolution of humanity from mere matter to spiritual consciousness as summarized by Pope Emeritus Benedict.

Part V:  Pope Emeritus Benedict discusses Teilhard de Chardin’s views on the evolution of humanity in the Christian context towards the Omega Point, or the Cosmic Christ.

Part VI:  Cardinal Henri de Lubac discusses the incarnational theology of Teilhard de Chardin that has Christ as its center.

Posted in Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Teilhard de Chardin Quote of the Week (May 20): In the Beginning . . .

big_bang2

“In the beginning was Power, intelligent, loving, energizing. In the beginning was the Word, supremely capable of mastering and moulding whatever might come into being in the world of matter. In the beginning there were not coldness and darkness: there was the Fire. This is the truth.

So, far from light emerging gradually out of the womb of our darkness, it is the Light, existing before all else was made which, patiently, surely, eliminates our darkness. As for us creatures, of ourselves we are but emptiness and obscurity. But you, my God, are the inmost depths, the stability of that eternal milieu, without duration or space, in which our cosmos emerges gradually into being and grows gradually to its final completeness, as it loses those boundaries which to our eyes seem so immense. Everything is being; everywhere there is being and nothing but being, save in the fragmentation of creatures and the clash of their atoms.”

— From Mass on the World

Posted in Teilhard Quote of the Week | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Pentecost: Go Light Your World

I love this song and thought it is a wonderful theme for Pentecost

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment